TODAY THE NEW YORK
DAILY NEWS ENDORSED HILLARY. CLINTON. FOR THE PRESIDENCY, I SAY THAT
YOU SHOULD READ THEIR EDITORIAL. BECAUSE IT IS BOTH POSITIVE FOR
HILLARY CLINTON, IT IS ALSO ONE.
OF THE MOST ANTI-BERNIE SANDERS
PIECES I HAVE EVER READ. A LOT. OF PEOPLE DON'T LIKE IT,
INCLUDING SHAWN KING WHO IS A. WRITER FOR THE SITE.
HE TOOK
ISSUE WITH SOME OF THE CLAIMS. THEY MADE IN THAT EDITORIAL AND
WROTE HIS OWN PIECE WHICH IS NOW. ALSO ON THE NEW YORK DAILY NEWS. OUR REPORTER JORDAN CAUGHT UP
WITH HIM TO SPEAK ABOUT THIS.
HERE IS SOME OF THAT. >> BERNIE WAS RIGHT WITH WHAT HE
SAID ABOUT HOW BIG BANKS COULD. BE BROKEN UP. THERE WAS A
FUNDAMENTAL MISUNDERSTANDING.
HERE ABOUT WHO HAS THE POWER TO. DO THAT. NOT THAT BERNIE WAS
WRONG, BUT BERNIE WAS ACTUALLY. RIGHT, ACCORDING TO
ROBERT WRIGHT.
THE PRESIDENT HAS THE POWER. >> THERE YOU SEE SHAWN KING
TALKING ABOUT ONE OF THE THINGS. THAT WAS BROUGHT UP IN THE
EDITORIAL, THAT BEING WHAT THEY. THOUGHT WAS IN AN ADEQUATE
PERFORMANCE ON THE PART OF.
BERNIE SANDERS WHEN IT COMES TO
SOME OF HIS ANSWERS THAT HE GAVE. IN AN INTERVIEW WITH THE NEW. YORK DAILY NEWS. IT HAS BEEN
DISSECTED AND DIGESTED BY EVERY.
MEDIA OUTLET OVER THE PAST
COUPLE OF WEEKS. I PERSONALLY. THINK THE EXPECTATIONS AFTER THE
FACT THAT THE MEDIA HAS PLACED. ON BERNIE SANDERS, IN TERMS OF
THE LEVEL OF DETAIL HE WAS.
SUPPOSED TO PROVIDE FOR. TECHNICAL POLICY, AND ONE
PORTION OF ONE ANSWER, IS. ABSOLUTELY INSANE. BUT THEY TOOK
IT VERY SERIOUSLY AND THEY SAY.
THAT IT'S ONE OF THE REASONS
THEY HAVE TO VOTE FOR HILLARY. CLINTON. WHICH I FIND IRONIC. HILLARY
CLINTON ALSO SAYS THAT SHE WOULD.
BE WILLING TO BREAK UP BIG
BANKS. DID SHE HAVE A BIG. SITDOWN INTERVIEW WITH THE DAILY. NEWS? DID SHE PROVIDE IN-DEPTH
DETAILS ABOUT HOW SHE WOULD DO.
THAT? NO. THAT NO EVIDENCE IS
ENOUGH FOR THE NEW DAILY NEWS TO. ENDORSE HER. >> I KNOW WE HAVE MORE FROM
SHAWN KING, HE IS A BAD ASS.
HE MAKES A LOT OF REALLY
GOOD STATEMENTS. >>HERE IS MORE ABOUT HIS VIEW OF
BERNIE SANDER'S KNOWLEDGE OF THE. SPECIFICS WHEN IT COMES TO
BERNIE SANDERS. >>I WAS FLABBERGASTED AT THE
NOTION, AND I SEE THIS IN MY.
PIECE, PEOPLE WERE MAKING IT
OUT LIKE SHE HE HAD NO IDEA. WHAT HE WAS TALKING ABOUT. >> RIGHT. >>HE LIVES AND BREATHES THESE
ISSUES AND HAS DONE SO FOR OVER.
30 YEARS. IT WAS A SHORT
INTERVIEW, A 45 MINUTE. INTERVIEW, WHERE I THINK HE HAD A TON OF. GROUND HE WANTED TO COVER.
I SAY
THAT WITH COMPASSIONATE EARS, LIKE, I HEARD THE INTERVIEW WAS
RUSHED. HAD HE KNOWN THAT HE WAS. GOING TO GET KILLED ON IT ON THE
BACKEND, HE WOULD'VE SPENT THE. WHOLE INTERVIEW UNPACKING, YOU.
DO THIS AND DO THAT. HE IS KNOWN FOR BEING A GUY
THAT IS INTO THE MINUTIA. >>THAT IS TRUE. >>THE FINAL PIECE WE WANT TO
SHOW YOU FROM JORDAN'S TALK.
WITH SHAWN KING HAS TO DO
WITH HIS POSITION AS THIS. ACTIVIST WHO DISAGREES WITH THE
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS, BUT. ACTUALLY WORKS THERE FULL-TIME. >> I AM A YOUNG TURK INSIDE OF
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS.
THIS IS IN. ESSENCE. I GET A LOT OF FREEDOM
TO TALK ABOUT REVOLUTIONARY. THOUGHTS AND MOVEMENTS AND.
STRUGGLES, BUT BY AND LARGE, IT
IS GOING TO BE INDEPENDENT. MEDIA SOURCES THAT DRIVE
THIS CONVERSATION. >> YES. I MEAN, THAT IS PRETTY
COURAGEOUS TO SAY ESPECIALLY.
WHEN YOU ARE IN SOME WAYS
CRITICIZING THE VERY PUBLICATION. YOU ARE WORKING FOR. THAT IS. EXACTLY WHAT A YOUNG TURK WOULD
DO.
THAT IS WHAT CENK DID WITH. MSNBC, THAT IS WHAT WE HAVE DONE
WHEN IT COMES TO CALLING OUT ANY. TYPE OF MEDIA ORGANIZATION. I
RESPECT SHAWN KING'S WORK.
I. HAVE BEEN FOLLOWING HIS WORK FOR
A WHILE. I LOVE THIS INTERVIEW, I THINK IT'S GREAT. WITH THAT.
SAID, THE NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
OBVIOUSLY HAS SOME INTEREST IN. MAKING BERNIE SANDERS LOOK BAD.
REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOU THINK OF. BERNIE SANDERS, OR THE MEDIA
COVERING HIM, THERE IS A VERY. SIMPLE WAY TO FIGURE OUT WHETHER.
OR NOT A CANDIDATE HAS THOUGHT
THROUGH HIS POLICIES OR EVEN. WHETHER OR NOT HE IS ON THE
RIGHT SIDE OF AN ISSUE. ALL YOU. HAVE TO DO IS LOOK ON HIS
WEBSITE.
WE HAVE THESE. DISCUSSIONS ABOUT POLICIES ALL
THE TIME. WHILE HE IS GETTING. CRITICIZED, YOU CAN JUST GO TO.
HIS WEBSITE AND SEE EXACTLY HOW
HE WOULD FIND THE HIGHER. EDUCATION PROGRAM HE HAS IN
MIND, HOW HE WOULD GO AFTER BIG. BANKS. HE IS SO DETAILED ON HIS.
OWN WEBSITE THAT MAKING IT SEEM
LIKE HE HAS NO IDEA WHAT HE IS. TALKING ABOUT IS JUST LUDICROUS.
THAT IS RIDICULOUS. HE IS A VETERAN
POLITICIAN. HE HAS BEEN IN THE.
SENATE FOR DECADES. >>75 YEARS. >> HE HAS BEEN ON THE RIGHT SIDE
OF THESE ISSUES FOR A LONG TIME. HE IS VERY EDUCATED AND AWARE OF
WHAT THESE ISSUES ARE AND HOW WE.
NEED TO FIX THEM. THE SPIN
MACHINE CAN CONTINUE SPINNING, BUT THE MOST EDUCATED PEOPLE
THE MOST AWARE PEOPLE KNOW WHAT. THE TRUTH IS WHICH IS WHY YOUNG
PEOPLE WHO WERE NOT DETERRED. FROM BERNIE SANDERS SIMPLY
BECAUSE THE NEW YORK DAILY.
NEWS WANTED TO MAKE
HIM LOOK BAD. >> I READ HIS RESPONSE WHY HE
DOESN'T AGREE. IT'S JUST CRAP. I.
AM NOT SAYING THE NEW DAILY NEWS
IS CRAP, ALTHOUGH THEIR. HEADLINES ARE CRAP. I AM SURE
THERE ARE A LOT OF GREAT PEOPLE. THAT WORK THERE, BUT THAT.
PARTICULAR EDITORIAL SUCKS. IT
DOESN'T SUCK BECAUSE IT ENDORSES. HILLARY CLINTON OR IS AGAINST
BERNIE SANDERS, IT SUCKS BECAUSE. IT READS LIKE EITHER A PERSON
WITH MULTIPLE PERSONALITIES.
OR TWO PEOPLE WERE
FIGHTING OVER A KEYBOARD AND. GOING BACK-AND-FORTH EVERY OTHER. PARAGRAPH. IT LAYS OUT A VIEW OF
WHAT IS WRONG WITH AMERICA.
THE. ECONOMY IS RIGGED AGAINST THE. WORKERS, OUR INCOME IS
NOT RISING, IT DOES ALL OF THIS. BEFORE LEADING IT TO HOW HILLARY.
CLINTON IS THE PERSON THAT
RECOGNIZES THAT MORE THAN BERNIE. SANDERS. THEN IT GOES THROUGH-
MOST OF THE EDITORIAL IS NOT. ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON,
IT'S ABOUT BERNIE SANDERS.
IT. GOES THROUGH EACH OF HIS
POSITIONS AND THEN TALKS ABOUT. HOW HE IS WRONG, AND DESPITE
THEM UNDERSTANDING THE PROBLEMS, EVERY ONE OF THEIR OPPOSITIONS
TO BERNIE SANDERS POLICIES IS. BASED ON SOME INSANE RIGHT-WING.
FRAMING OF WHAT REGULATION DOES,
WHAT TAXATION ACCOMPLISHES, ALL. OF THAT. THEN IT IS NOT EVEN
INTERNALLY CONSISTENT TO THAT. DEGREE BECAUSE THEY SAY BERNIE
SANDERS WOULD PUT TOO MANY TAXES.
ON AMERICANS. AND THEN THEY SAY
WE ARE VOTING FOR HILLARY. CLINTON BECAUSE SHE WILL TAX THE
WEALTHY IN AMERICA. IT'S THE.
SAME BACK-AND-FORTH ON HEALTHCARE.
EVERYTHING THAT THEY ATTACK. BERNIE SANDERS ON, THEY THEN
TAKE HILLARY CLINTON'S SIDE, REGARDLESS OF THE FACT THAT THEY. HAVEN'T RECEIVED ANY DETAILS
FROM HER ON HOW SHE WILL PAY FOR. THAT.
EVERYBODY GOES CRAZY OVER. THE FUNDING OF BERNIE'S FOUR
YEARS OF PUBLIC FREE COLLEGE. HOW IS HILLARY CLINTON GOING TO
PAY FOR HER EDUCATION? I DON'T KNOW BECAUSE SHE HAS
NEVER BEEN ASKED ABOUT IT. >> FOR ANYONE WHO GOES TO HER
WEBSITE AND READS HER POLICY.
IDEAS, YOU CAN SEE THAT THE
REASON WHY SHE IS NOT GOING TO. HAVE A HARD TIME PAYING FOR IT
IS BECAUSE THERE IS LITERALLY NO. CHANGE IN HOW THE SYSTEM IS SET. UP RIGHT NOW.
HER DEBT
FORGIVENESS PLAN ACTUALLY ENDS. UP BEING EARNED INCOME AFTER
THOSE 20 YEARS THAT SHE. SPECIFIES. SO YOU GET TAXED BY
THE IRS.
IF YOU HAVE $150,000 OF. STUDENT LOAN DEBT, AND ALL OF A. SUDDEN YOU GET FORGIVEN AND YOU
GET A 1099 FOR THAT AMOUNT, YOU. ARE FUCKED.
THAT IS NOT A GOOD
SYSTEM OF DEALING WITH STUDENT. LOAN DEBT IN THIS COUNTRY.
INSTEAD OF GOING THE FEDERAL. GOVERNMENT ROUTE IN THE FORM OF
A FEDERAL STUDENT LOAN, YOU WILL. OWE THE IRS IN THE FORM OF A TAX.
DEBT. AGAIN, IT IS NOT ABOUT WHETHER
OR NOT WE CAN PAY FOR PROGRAMS. THE PROGRAMS ARE FULL OF SHIT. WORRY ABOUT HOW WE'RE GOING TO
PAY FOR IT BECAUSE IT IS.
INCREMENTAL CHANGE OR
NO CHANGE AT ALL. >> A BIG PORTION OF THAT IS SHE
IS GOING TO EVALUATE YOUR FAMILY. AND SEE HOW MUCH YOUR FAMILY CAN. CONTRIBUTE.
THEY TOLD MY FAMILY
HOW MUCH THEY CAN CONTRIBUTE. IN REALITY WHAT MY FAMILY. COULD CONTRIBUTE WAS ZERO WHICH
IS WHY I HAVE SO MUCH STUDENT. LOAN DEBT.
AS I HAVE RIGHT NOW. THAT IS NOT
A SOLUTION. IT'S JUST PLUGGING. IN RANDOM VARIABLES ABOUT HOW MUCH
PARENTS ARE SUPPOSED TO.
CONTRIBUTE. THAT IS NOT A
SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM WE HAVE..
No comments:
Post a Comment